Side Effects' plot ended up not being exactly what I had read about. The main character ends up not even being the character played Rooney Mara, but Jude Law (at least I think so, thus why he has top billing and probably also due to his seniority as an actor).
Rooney is Emily, who is anxious that her husband (Channing Tatum) is being released from prison after some creative insider trading. He quickly gets back into old habits which she wants to get away from, and it appears she has had depression in the past for a couple reasons. She tries to commit suicide, bringing her to the attention of a new doctor, Dr. Banks (Jude Law). He is sympathetic and tries to put her on different anti-depression medications, and goes so far as to speak to her old doctor, Dr. Siebert (Catherine Zeta Jones) about her past history, who mentions to him a new drug called Ablixa.
As is (probably) prevalent in the industry, a drug company approaches Dr. Banks and his colleagues to promote a different new drug. Dr. Banks takes this paid endorsement due to various financial needs but is open with his patients about his paid participation when he asks them to go on the test trials. The film shows one patient eagerly taking advantage of having a drug provided free.
Meanwhile, Emily mentions a friend has tried Ablixa with good results, so Dr. Banks, who has tried other drugs like Zoloft for her with no success, prescribes that for her. It is pretty successful in lightening her mood, but the side effects include bouts of sleepwalking where Emily acts out things and has no memory of doing so. During one of these bouts Emily does something tragic, which puts Dr. Banks' reputation in jeopardy. He is pressured to let Emily take the blame for a crime she has committed "due to reasons of insanity" rather than it become known that the drug he prescribed to her as the potential reason for her actions. Although he does sincerely want to help Emily, he bows to the pressure that he is getting from many sides and commits her to a mental health facility under his continued supervision, rather than send her outright to prison.
There are still a lot of gray areas of suspicion about him so Dr. Banks still wants to clear his reputation even though he is not legally blamed. During his own investigation he begins to suspect that Emily is not as innocent as he has been led to believe, and that there has been a conspiracy around him.
Despite the switcheroo in the plot, I would say this is an entertaining film. It has signature Steven Soderbergh moments (he directed). But the moral issues that the film brings up in the first half of the movie--about how these drugs and their side effects are not fully understood, doctors prescribing them willy nilly with little regard to their effects, pharma companies having power to push their drugs, doctors putting aside their patients' well-being to protect their own careers--are put aside and not even addressed anymore in the latter half. The film becomes a thriller as Dr. Banks seeks to find out how and why things happened.
In the last scene, the film very lightly goes back to its original theme of prescription drugs, especially anti-depressants, keeping people in their depression rather than helping them but the Dr. Banks character ends up not even thinking again about the heavy moral issues he experienced earlier in the story.
Like I said though the film is entertaining and had some visual aspects in the first part that helps the viewer relate to
Emily's apparent doped up depression--out of focus shots, distorted images in a mirror, slow motion action. A late-in-the-film lesbian storyline also feels gimmicky, although the acting from Jude Law and Rooney Mara are good.
I think though if the film ended instead with some introspection on Dr. Banks' part to his near-miss and making him perhaps fearful of facing something like this again, or even ending on his character instead of Emily, which the film does, would make this a more socially serious film without taking away from the thriller part of the story.
No comments:
Post a Comment